Digital library (interview) RAI Educational

Bill Gates

Parigi - European IT Forum, 04/09/95

"Windows 95 and Microsoft's strategy"

SUMMARY:

  • Windows 95 has sold very well in Europe, although not as quickly as in the USA (1).
  • Microsoft has a large group of people dealing with technical c calls in Europe (2).
  • Microsoft has always been dependent on partners (3).
  • Windows connects to everything: to mainframes, to AS400, to UNIX. If you want to connect two arbitrary system together, sometimes the best way to do it is to put Windows in the middle as sort of a universal connector (4).
  • The fastest growing business for Microsoft is the Windows NT and the Back Office, The constraint on Microsoft has never been financial - we have 5 billion dollars in the bank. The constraint on us has always been how quickly can we hire in great people to both build the software and help our customers use it (5).
  • Microsoft is investing in anything that is high volume that works on the PC (6).
  • The Microsoft Network was launched with Windows 95. Our goal is to create a community of users (7).
  • IThe Internet is low cost connectivity and that will drive demand for software. Some people think we're going to have dumb terminals in the world of the Internet; I just disagree with that (8).
  • Microsoft Service is available world-wide and has local phone numbers throughout Europe (9).
  • We will succeed with Microsoft Network if we have better content, better performance (10).
  • We have an advantage: all of our products work together. And if somebody's going to tell us our products should not work together, that'll be too bad for customers (11).
  • The directory is a key component of Windows because that's the way people send electronic mail, that's the way file security works. We are working with other companies to set some directory standards there that basically use the Back Office APIs (12).
  • The beauty of what is called the messaging API, which is part of the Windows platform, is that how an application works with the messaging system is decoupled from what that messaging system is (13).
  • The portable computer is getting better all the time, whether it's battery life or the screen. I still believe in the small form category and/. Within the next year or so Microsoft will bring something out that may get that started (14).
  • The big place that you want to break the 4 gigabyte limit is on the server so you can take a data base that people used to think of as big like an entire airline reservation data base and have it in memory so that your access feeds to very quickly. We are already at work on 64 bit NT (15).
  • There are many media companies that we're bringing into this interactive space to really drive the Internet and drive the use of PCs (16).
  • In a sense content has always been king. The platform is just there). We're going to do content about Windows, we're going to do content for education but we won't be a very large company (17) (18).
  • The trend against intellectual property theft is very positive (19).
  • The network is a great thing for delivering information. Some customers will choose to use it to deliver software (20).
  • No high technology company has any kind of guaranteed position, it's all based on who they hire, how hard they work, are they really smart. There's nothing about products or size that provides any guarantee (21).
  • It is very possible IBM will do a good job managing Lotus and we'll just wait and see. My view is that software is an industry by itself, and that people's decisions to buy software should be independent of hardware (22).
  • The success of the Internet has been the biggest surprise of the last 10 years (23).
  • Data centre managers and consumers should be conservative; they are expected to make things work. Once you have electronic mail in a company, having that break down is even worse than any other system (24).
  • Microsoft has been in Europe for a long time and have had incredible success with the local people, but it is always new partners to meet the challenge (25).

homepage

lezioni


digital library

authorities
subjects
biblioteca digitale

autori

cerca

aiuto

INTERVIEW:

Question 1
Bill, I guess congratulations are in order not only on the 20th anniversary of Microsoft but on the launch of Windows 95. I have an article which says that a million copies of Windows 95 sold the first 4 days on shelf. Do you expect the same result in Europe.

Answer
Well, we've seen a huge advance order from the retail channels here in Europe and that's the first time we've seen that on a product. There's a tendency because there's not as many software on the outlets. The adoption curve we see is a little bit smoother. In the US there's a tiny bit more of a bulge at the beginning with those hard-core users, but I think for the first time we're seeing that same thing here in Europe, although maybe not in the same degree, maybe not quite as many people getting up at midnight to buy a copy.

Back

Question 2
Many people have called Microsoft with technical issues. It said Microsoft was geared up for 20,000 calls a day. How do you handle the support in Europe for that with multiple countries and multiple languages?

Answer
We have a significant presence in all the countries here and we actually do support in the country, so we've got a very large group here in France that is taking those calls. And we've outsourced and we've found partners who can give us even more capacity beyond what we normally have. So in France, Germany, the UK, throughout Europe, the product is now available, and we're getting a lot of calls but actually less per unit than we expected and we'll be working some long hours to help everybody get going.

Back

Question 3
How about the issue of getting access to Windows 95 is one thing, being able to implement it in a large organisation where many workstations, many of which are executing mission critical tasks, you rely pretty much on partners for that part of the implementation plan. Does that make you nervous at all that these people are sort of standing between you and your customers?

Answer
Our whole strategy has always been dependent on partners. You know when we got into this business, it was a new model where the retailers, the chip companies, the system companies, only by helping those partners be successful could we be successful, and with Windows 95 that's absolutely the case again. We needed the new generation of hardware with plug and play. We needed a new round of 32 bit applications. And most importantly, we needed the solution providers to be able to go out and do the installations. Now the way this happens is it's like all the adoption cycles. A lot of people will wait until they hear about pioneering customers doing it and having a great experience. And we actually worked even before the availability date to get some major customers who saw the benefits and wanted to be the first, worked with them to get it rolled out. And now we have those as case studies. In every country there are a couple of major ones; on a world-wide basis people like Ford Motor are moving very rapidly and have thousands of installations already. And that's the kind of data we want to share that'll get the next wave after the pioneers to come, and it will happen. The availability within the channel of expertise to help with this is really quite impressive, because for the last 9 months people were joining up. We had the date clearly in mind, we gave the channels huge incentives to come and get trained. We gave the early product to them. And so for a generational change the business is more ready than it ever has been.

Back

Question 4
You see NT, Windows 95 and Back Office as the client-server solution of choice. I associate the word "open" with client-server and I'm wondering if you'd consider that an all Microsoft solution as an open solution or how do you accommodate point products of other vendors?

Answer
We are going to operate with all the other different products. To me openness means choice, the customer getting the best price performance and having the most flexibility. And certainly the Windows environment provides the most choice, more than any other system, whether it is UNIX or whatever many computers or mainframes that you can imagine that are out there. Because of the incredible volume of Windows it has become the connection point where Windows connects to everything. Windows connects to mainframes, Windows connects to AS400, Windows connects to UNIX. In fact, if you want to connect two arbitrary system together, sometimes the best way to do it is to put Windows in the middle as sort of a universal connector.

Back

Question 5
Let me ask you a question related to the thrust that Microsoft is making with products like NT and Back Office, while at the same time you are doing some significant work in the consumer market. How do you allocate your resources between these markets that are spreading, giving more and more markets. Where do you put your money?

Answer
We are faced with incredible opportunities and so we're growing all the different groups inside Microsoft. The fastest growing business for us is the Windows NT and the Back Office, so our sever activity is going even faster than our consumer business is and also Windows and Office are growing pretty healthily. And so the real constraint on Microsoft has never been financial. I mean we have 5 billion dollars in the bank. The constraint on us has always been how quickly can we hire in great people to both build the software and help our customers use it. And so we increased our R&D over 40 % last year and we'll increase it over 40 % again this year. We are able to pursue a lot of initiatives some of which are near-term and some of which are long-term. And, you know, take an area like data base. Recently, there's been some good articles talking about the level of expertise we've been able to hire in from Jim Gray to Gordon Bell, to dozens of experts, who, if they've seen the opportunity to influence the data base world working with us rather than the more classic computer vendors, have come in and formed really a great team.

Back

Question 6
So we can assume then that Microsoft will continue to expand in all directions.

Answer
Well, not in all directions. What we're good at is building software products. We do define the word software to include content-oriented things like encyclopaedias. Now a lot of people ask me nowadays if we want to be in the media, and the answer is that in the interactive world we do see a chance to facilitate some new things and do some things ourselves, but in the classic print world-video world we have no interest in that. You know, we might end up with a minority interest in something that's part of a partnership aimed at interactive, but we're a software company and you won't find us owning wires or frequencies; we'll work in partnership there. You won't find us in chips or hardware. But within the world of software, anything that's high volume software that works on the PC we're probably investing in.

Back

Question 7
You said you are software company but you're also now with the launch of Windows 95 an electronic on-line service network company as well. Can you give us a picture of as how much Microsoft service network will roll out in Europe, what percentage of revenues on-line networking will be a few years in the future?

Answer
The Microsoft Network was launched with Windows 95 and it's a completely new thing for us and we're very committed to it. It's a community on the Internet. Actually as we're starting up some of the connections go through x25 networks but we're transitioning all of that to TCTIP networks so that it's easy for people to get to the entire Internet as an MNS customer. We'll also make it so that if you sign up to the Internet through some provider, you'll just pay a subscription fee with no hourly charge to have access to the entire Microsoft network. Our goal here is to create a community of users, to have it be the best place for a Windows user to go or an Office user to go. In fact, we'll have shortcuts right inside our products, where if you want to get help or you want to go up to the bulletin board, you just click on that shortcut and it'll connect you up without your knowing any phone numbers or having to navigate around. And so there's a lot we're learning. Like all the businesses Microsoft gets into, there's a huge expectation and we're going to get a lot of feedback. The great thing about Microsoft Network is we get to release a new version very day. And so people say they want more content or if we see something that's not working fast enough we can be improving that, so even over these first 6 months you're going to see a lot of evolution. Our goal is to be the largest Internet community. Although there'll be thousands and thousands out there, we think we have a chance of doing something substantial. In terms of revenue it's hard to say. The entire on-line service business today is tiny. And a lot of the revenue potential comes from advertising, which will take 3 or 4 years before advertisers really see the value of what's the demographic, does it influence my behaviour, can it be tracked properly. But we're optimistic enough about that that we're willing to make even for us a gigantic investment.

Back

Question 8
I am sure there are some vendors that grin to hear you call the market tiny. Let me talk a minute about the Internet. It's been suggested that actually the Internet is a substitute for Microsoft. There is an idea of a 400 dollar Internet terminal, where all the information and software is really kept on the network, the Internet, rather than a desktop device. Maybe you could react to that. Is the Internet an opportunity ? Have you really debunked the notion that the Internet appliance will replace the desktop computer?

Answer
The Internet is a great thing. It's low cost connectivity and that will drive demand for software. The people will want to do creative work, people will still write documents, they'll still create spreadsheets, they'll still want to manage their finances and look at that data in different ways. And so you're going to see rich objects out on the Internet that fully take advantage of the PC. When you're browsing the Internet everything on your PC is being used. For example the graphics: there's going to be 3-D navigation that will to be the key way to move around on the Internet, so that will push your graphics to the limit. Your memory, the kind of caching and code that's being used to navigate around that will be very heavily used. Your local storage to keep your personal preferences that let you store things away for going back to look at later or anything that you want to edit or do creation on. And so the Internet, people will think we're going to have dumb terminals in the world of the Internet; I just disagree with that. It's the old X-terminal argument over and over again. And how did X-terminals do ? It looks like people actually wanted to use software, and so the Internet is super positive. Nobody controls the Internet and nobody knows exactly what direction it's going to take. But it is a powerful and important thing for every strategy we have at Microsoft. Windows is the best way to get at the Internet; Windows NT the best way to publish on the Internet, that is central to what we're working on.

Back

Question 9
Is Microsoft Service rolling out in Europe and the US?

Answer
It is available world-wide and we have local phone numbers throughout Europe. A lot of the content today is still in English; we're announcing every week more local content providers and better ways to get connected in, moving over to the IT network by mid 96, and hopefully finding a way to work with the telecommunications companies to get the connectivity prices down because they're still quite a bit higher here in Europe than in the United States.

Back

Question 10
Do you have an update on the pressure by the US government to decouple the Microsoft Service Network from the Windows 95?

Answer
No-one has ever suggested that there's any criteria for new versions of Windows, other than our trying to keep our customers happy. If somebody suggests that, we'll try and see how that fits in with a market-driven approach. But all we have in Windows 95 is the access code. Access offer is easily available through any number of channels. And we won't succeed with the Microsoft Network because our access offer is in there. We will succeed if we have better content, better performance, a lot of things that we're working hard on; it's a fun challenge.

Back

Question 11
So that's really your answer to the on-line service providers who complain that you have an unfair advantage by putting the icon right in with Windows 95.

Answer
We have an advantage: all of our products work together. And if somebody's going to tell us our products should not work together, that'll be too bad for customers. It turns out the Microsoft Network is the place where you can go and get Windows support, meet the Windows developers, and it uses the Windows 95 interface. We use shortcuts. Now all the other on-line people will be adopting that, but the way we use shortcuts is a great thing, so it really took Windows 95 to be able to do the network there. Remember that on-line services is hypercompetitive. With the Internet anybody can get in and publish. I mean, there's never been anything as open as the Internet is. We just, you know, we're going to do our best to make sure our software is what unleashes that potential.

Back

Question 12
Maybe you can enlighten us as to as more and more people go on the Internet and get connected as you mentioned with PC communications, how can they keep in touch with each other? Do you have a vision for how directory services will roll out? We'll all have one number we carry with us around the globe? How is Microsoft going to help bring this about?

Answer
The directory is a key component of Windows because that's the way people send electronic mail, that's the way file security works. And a lot of corporations are going to want to move away from having multiple directories, having their data base have a directory, having their mail package, having their file share package. It's kind of a nightmare today. And that's why we with Back Office we use the single directory and we've announced an interface, so that you can program in a way that you don't care whose directory it is. You just write the software once, whether it's NBS in the back end, Banyan Vines or our thing, allocations will just work. Directories are a mess today because you go out on the Internet and you have to use a different name on different services because they're taken and there's no authentication. We are working with other companies to set some directory standards there that basically use the Back Office APIs.

Back

Question 13
Does this same concept apply inside corporations? An ACI with electronic mail connects people up so they can communicate electronically, which often entails tying together different types of e-mail systems. Does the same thing work here? Can you use Microsoft products to make that happen?

Answer
Yes, the beauty of what's called the messaging API, which is part of the Windows platform, is that how an application works with the messaging system is decoupled from what that messaging system is. We have something called the provider interface so the front end you use for the mail system is decoupled from the back end you use for the mail system. Then you have gateways so you can use multiple back end systems and those can work together. So you can evolve towards an enterprise mail system. The most important product we're doing in this space is Microsoft Exchange. We would claim it's the first real enterprise mail system that's designed to be a client-server system and really service the needs of mail users. Actually it's the only product Microsoft has that I think the marketplace is underestimating. But as people move in the new mail systems, they can evolve machine by machine and evolve the backbone step by step and evolve the front ends likewise step by step by step. There is mail built into Windows 95 but you don't have to use that.

Back

Question 14
How about for mobile workers and users of the you mentioned the hand held device and the different form factors. Where do you stand with your system for operating faxes and printers and things like that ? How do you see Microsoft actually helping them work with all these various form factors and intelligent appliances?

Answer
The portable computer is getting better all the time, whether it's battery life or the screen. I carry mine with me wherever I go. I think that's more and more common. There's a lot of features in Windows 95 that relate to that. The ability to dial in and do file sharing built in, the ability to dial in and do mail is built in. A thing called the Briefcase where you can take a set of files with you, that's built in. The ability to do hot docking so you don't have to turn your machine on and off where you want to put it in the docking station. It automatically detects that configuration. That's built in. So for the full size form factor, I think we're in good shape. For the smaller form factor none of the products to date have been successful. I was disappointed the Newton didn't sell better and the General Magic didn't sell better. I still believe in the category and we have more people working on it than every before. And within the next year or so working with hardware partners we'll bring something out that I think may get that started, but even if it doesn't, we're going to keep going at it. We think that's a fundamental product category.

Back

Question 15
We are getting 64 bit chips starting next year with P6, we're just getting into 32 bit applications this year, and some would argue we're still half way in 16 with operating systems. When will we go to the next step, when will you come out with a 64 bit operating system ? Or is that just an impossible task seeing how long it took to get to the 32 bit operating systems?

Answer
One thing that was very complicated is the original PC had a memory model which was the 8088 20-bit memory model. Then we had a segmented memory model with the 286. Now we have a situation which is really clean where a 386, 486, 586, P6 they're the same architecture and they're are just faster implementations of the same architecture. And that's allowed the entire software industry to have a real focus there, and the move to 32 bits is very, very rapid. When you're using 32 bit applications you don't execute any 16 bit instructions. If you're using 16 bit applications for emulation or for fixing the drivers we do, but there's no 16 bit code that's in there for any reason other than compatibility with what's come before. In terms of 64 bit we are working on 64 bit NT. There aren't that many people who are running into the 4 gigabyte limit. And in fact I haven't seen that many PCs that have 4 gigabytes of memory yet. We will get that. The big place that you want to break the 4 gigabyte limit is on the server, whereby doing really amazing caching you can actually take a data base that people used to think of as big like an entire airline reservation data base and have it in memory so that your access feeds to very quickly. You have to make sure that you'll still have the fail-safe capabilities, but there are ways to do that. So we're already at work on 64 bit NT and it isn't a big deal at all because the 32 bit applications can co-exist and it's very clean.

Back

Question 16
I'd like to talk about the Microsoft company and some of the directions related to where you're going with content, for instance are you still talking with Turner Broadcasting about a network investment?

Answer
We approached Turner like we have many media companies about doing some interactive work helping them get CNN into an interactive form. Now with Turner and Time-Warner very likely to merge, we'll pause till that merger takes place and then spend time talking to the new combined entity, but there are many, many media companies that we're bringing into this interactive space to really drive the Internet and drive the use of PCs.

Back

Question 17
You have said that we are in the third wave of computing or putting the platform for full connectivity and the next wave is where the connectivity is transparent and we have the information society, which means content becomes king. How does that change the direction of Microsoft when content is more important than the platforms that are used to deliver it?

Answer
In a sense content has always been king. The platform is just there. It's like electricity or water. It's just there and you can do with it what you will. You know when we made Microsoft Word as a tool, the most important thing was how people used that tool. And we have lots of multimedia offering tools. We will be a small part of the content space. There's a few things like encyclopaedias and atlases we may do very well in, but because content is so broad, no company even these media giants won't be a huge percentage of it, because the creativity tools, even somebody without a lot of money can do special effects and anybody can publish and so the diversity in that content space it will be mind-blowing. We're very content. There's plenty of opportunity for us to be primarily a platform company and only to a limited degree a content company but hopefully with some cool things that will lead the way.

Back

Question 18
So we don't have to worry about Microsoft buying up a lot of content companies and owning content specifically. Do you have access to specific film libraries or data bases?

Answer
No, we don't. We're going to do content things. We're going to do content about Windows, we're going to do content for education but we won't be a very large company. And the industry structure of content will just have immense variety. There's one example where we're quite large, which is in encyclopaedias. Today our CD encyclopaedia outsells the best-selling print encyclopaedia or any other CD encyclopaedia by a factor of 5. It's 10 % the cost of a print encyclopaedia and it's far more engaging, so that's an example where the print world has moved to interactive and we've been able to play a role.

Back

Question 19
Perhaps you could talk a little bit about intellectual property rights. Perhaps Microsoft are violated as much as anyone or more than anyone particularly in the Far East. Do you see any solution to the violation of intellectual property rights in the developing countries or anywhere for that matter as we move forward?

Answer
The trend against intellectual property theft is very, very positive. You can go to Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, places where 5 years ago nobody paid for software and today the majority of users do pay for software. Here in Europe there was a dramatic impact in Italy a few years ago when the financial police realised they weren't getting their value-added tax when people weren't buying software and so within one year our sales doubled. That was quite a singular event. In most places it's more gradual. But as people become aware of copyright law, as they get a local software industry, it always improves. So we're going to keep investing in that. We have over 80 full-time people and we put 20 million a year into those education programs. There's a form of it, though, that's particularly a concern, which is counterfeiting, that is, where you get professionals who create something that looks like the real product. And we'll see more and more of that. That's why you see us using holograms and all sorts of special things, but staying one step ahead of those counterfeiters is tough.

Back

Question 20
One more question on the Microsoft business model itself. We've talked about the computer becoming network-centric, personal communications is improving. As the network becomes more important, how does that change your business model, which I would assume we would think of as company that is masterful at producing volumes of software that's shrink-wrapped, delivery to the public with lots of fanfare and strong marketing?

Answer
The network is a great thing for delivering information. Some customers will choose to use it to deliver software. In fact for our high end, for our corporate customers most of them don't take physical packages anymore. Most of them have what's called the select agreement that let's them do electronic distribution using their own network and the role of the channel is to help them manage that software, help them do the installations, all kinds of value-added services. Already for the top third of our customers, packaged software is a thing of the past. Now that may move down a little bit as mid-band and broadband networks become available pervasively, but we don't have ranches, we don't have a lot of investment in the exact technique that we send the software out in.

Back

Question 21
Are there any competitors that you worry about, or are all companies on earth more potential business partners than competitors?

Answer
If you had been IBM and you'd said: Who do we worry about it is unlikely you would have thought of Microsoft. The reason why no high technology company has any kind of guaranteed position and why if you even take a timeframe like 10 years, say to yourself, what will the most popular soft drink be in 10 years? I don't care, you know, how hard those guys work or who they hire, Coke will be the most popular soft drink. And in high technology, take any leader, is there greater than a 50 % chance I'll still be a leader ? Well it's all based on who they hire, how hard they work, are they really smart. There's nothing about products or size that provides any guarantee, IBM being a fine example of that. And so competition can come from the most unexpected places, you know, speech recognition, game machines growing up, not doing a good job on the Internet, there's many ways that we're challenged to move things forward quite rapidly. Some of our competitors have made missteps and so they're less prominent, say, than they have been, but it's still a very competitive field.

Back

Question 22
Let me ask you a specific question about the IBM buy-out of Lotus. Is that a brave move, a misstep or do you even think about it?

Answer
A lot of the people invested a lot in systems applications architecture or they really counted on 80 cycle, perhaps they were very dependent on office vision or maybe they're one of the companies that today are using OS/2 and wondering what applications they're going to be running in the future. And so it's very possible IBM will do a good job managing Lotus and we'll just wait and see. I'm a very biased person. My view is that software is an industry by itself. And that your people's decisions to buy software should be independent of hardware. And the whole thrust of IBM is the integration of they make their software work better with their hardware. That was the fundamental issue that caused the divorce over OS/2. We insisted that it stay neutral to all the hardware suppliers and that just isn't IBM's strategy. So IBM will do a fine job. They have lots of smart people, but I wouldn't say that that's a source of significant concern going forward.

Back

Question 23
What's the thing that's surprised you the most in the last 10 years of Microsoft, about the industry?

Answer
We knew that that communications would develop strongly and, therefore, foster a rich communication network. But was just about 18 months ago that we really started to pick up on the Internet as the seedcorn for the communications revolution. So that was a wonderful but I think broadly unexpected thing. 10 months ago we shipped Word that does the Internet work and with Windows 95 our Internet browser is on all the new machines with that, and our firewall and our high performance servers will be out early next year, so there's a lot of things that are just emerging based on making that most important to our strategy. That was fairly new. There's are a lot of things that take longer than I expected, like CD-ROM software. In 1986 we said it was going to be important, well it's just this year that that's sort of a fact. Windows NT, it is the only from scratch operating system that's been there for a long, long time and yet it just takes a lot of time to get all the applications and tools and things moved across. When I'm trying to push things forward, sometimes it seems like things move very slowly, but the direction is pretty much what we invested in having take place.

Back

Question 24
Do you find any conflict between the idea that Microsoft and IT vendors are fast-moving, fast-changing companies and the average customer MIS or data centre managers or consumers are actually very conservative buyers and purchasers?

Answer
Not at all. They should be conservative; they are expected to make things work. Once you have electronic mail in a company, having that break down is even worse than any other system. I f you can't write checks for a few hours, you know, people won't be super upset, but if the electronic mail goes down for a few hours, everybody's out in the hallway going "Hey, what happened here?" You might as well turn the electricity off. And so the kind of caution that we see is all, you know, very worthwhile and that's why we find customers who really have a need to be early and be pioneers, work with them, and then share those examples with other people, what was hard, you know, what was expensive, what went better than expected? And so this is an industry where that kind of sharing is fundamental, because we're dealing with very, very important issues.

Back

Question 25
Does Microsoft have any particular challenges or opportunities related to Europe, either individual countries or Europe as a region?

Answer
Everywhere that we're located we need to have a major local presence in order to build the right partnerships, that is, working with the hardware manufacturers, netmarket, but most importantly, the application developers and the solution providers. Particularly as NT is being used in all these different vertical industries we've got to get the accounting packages, the local business-oriented packages up on that. And so our evangelism has taken on a much more local flavour than ever before. For the horizontal applications, you just do that on a global basis and a lot of it's based in the US. For server kind of applications, it's far broader than that. It is interesting that SAP of Germany is probably the ISV that's been the best at pointing out the power that's there and what can be done with specific customer scenarios. For Europe we need to make sure we're getting our localisations done on a very timely basis, and with Windows 95 and all the products that go with that we've done better than ever before. We need to make sure that these European companies that span many countries that we do, you know, special things in the network, in the electronic mail that deal with multiple languages and have great support in every country. We've been here for a long, long time and have had incredible success with the local people, but it's a growth situation and we're always adding to meet the challenge.

Back

back to the top